If you build sites for a living, you’ve probably heard someone say, “Webflow crushes Squarespace for SEO”—but is that really true? Before you toss one platform for the other, you need some real answers, not marketing buzz. If you care about your site's search ranking, it’s about the nuts and bolts: How much can you tweak? Can you get granular with meta tags, sitemaps, and all that technical stuff?
SEO isn't just about keywords anymore; it’s about site speed, structured data, custom markup, and, yep, even little things like image optimization. Think of these platforms as toolboxes. Webflow gives you more knobs and dials right out of the gate. Want to mess with clean code? Set up 301 redirects by hand? Webflow says, “Go for it.” With Squarespace, you’re locked into lots of presets. That can make life easy but sometimes leaves you wishing you could make that one little edit that would actually help you rank higher.
Bottom line—you can get good SEO on either platform, but the journey getting there is totally different. So let’s see how they really stack up, feature for feature and in real-world use.
If you're weighing Webflow SEO versus Squarespace, the single biggest difference is how much you can poke under the hood. Webflow lets you touch almost every bit that matters for SEO. You want to write custom meta titles or descriptions for each page? Easy. Edit your robots.txt or sitemap yourself? No sweat. In Webflow, you can:
Squarespace, on the other hand, is more “set and forget.” Sure, you can update meta titles and descriptions, but you’re often stuck with whatever the template serves up. Custom code? It’s possible—sort of—but you’re limited to certain areas or forced to work with code blocks that don’t always show up where you want.
Here's how they stack up, feature by feature:
Feature | Webflow | Squarespace |
---|---|---|
Custom Meta Titles & Descriptions | Full control | Limited (some templates restrict) |
Robots.txt Editing | Directly editable | No manual control |
301 Redirects | Easy & visual | Basic, many manual steps |
Structured Data | Native support or custom | Workarounds needed |
Image Optimization | Lazy load and alt tags | Basic, some automation |
If you want to squeeze every last drop out of on-page SEO for web developers, Webflow just gives you more to work with. But that comes at the cost of having to learn the ropes. Squarespace makes a lot of decisions for you—good for beginners, sometimes frustrating for someone who wants to tinker.
If your projects need serious website builders SEO, like handling lots of product pages, advanced linking, or detailed tracking, the difference in control starts to really matter. I’ve seen my kid Ishan lose his mind trying to add a custom script for Schema in Squarespace, while Webflow took care of it in a few clicks.
Buckle up, because there are some big differences when it comes to Webflow SEO and what you get with Squarespace. Let’s go head-to-head on some of the top features that actually impact your site’s ranking.
Here’s a quick look at how the main features really stack up:
Feature | Webflow | Squarespace |
---|---|---|
Edit Meta Titles/Descriptions | Full control, CMS-driven | Standard per page |
Custom URL Slugs | Yes | Limited |
301 Redirects | Easy, unlimited | Available, limited options |
Robots.txt Editing | Yes | No native support |
Schema Markup | Customizable | Very basic support |
Image Optimization | Excellent (WebP, lazy-load) | Good, but less control |
Bottom line: If your site needs advanced SEO for web developers, custom data, or you just want full control, Webflow wins for flexibility. Squarespace does make basic SEO pretty painless for smaller, simpler sites—handy if you don’t want to tinker. But if you ever find yourself saying, “Why can’t I just...,” Webflow probably already has the switch you’re looking for.
If you want search engines to notice your site, speed is a huge deal. Google has straight-up said that site speed is a ranking factor. Here’s the reality: Webflow SEO gets a gold star here. Out of the box, Webflow sites usually load faster than Squarespace sites. Webflow uses super clean, lightweight code, and their hosting is built for fast performance worldwide. I’ve personally seen Webflow homepages hit a 95+ in Google’s PageSpeed Insights tool with zero fancy tweaking.
Squarespace, on the flip side, uses more scripts and heavier templates. Your site might look awesome, but the extra bloat means it often runs slower, especially if you pile on plugins and complex layouts. Some Squarespace sites score in the 60s or 70s on mobile speed, which isn’t great if you care about rankings. Even my kid Ishan’s school website is on Squarespace, and it drags on mobile.
Now, let’s talk CDN and global loading. Both platforms use a CDN—Webflow uses AWS and Fastly, and Squarespace uses its own CDN setup. Both keep your site snappy around the world, but edges to Webflow because it feels more developer-focused in performance tuning.
Platform | Typical Mobile Speed Score | Custom Code Control |
---|---|---|
Webflow | 90-98 | Full (HTML/CSS/JS) |
Squarespace | 60-80 | Limited (only some header/footer) |
What about indexing? Both platforms automatically set up sitemaps and robots.txt, but Webflow lets you edit these right in the dashboard—Squarespace doesn’t. If you’re fixing crawl issues or blocking test pages from Google, Webflow makes it easy, while Squarespace feels like working with kid gloves on. Another thing: Custom structured data (like schema markup) is way easier in Webflow. This matters for those rich Google search features, like breadcrumbs and ratings.
In the end, if you work with clients who need fast sites and easy indexing tweaks, Webflow is way more flexible. For anyone focused on serious SEO for web developers, it’s kind of a no-brainer.
If you want your Webflow SEO or Squarespace project to actually show up in search results, you’ve got to use every tool they offer. Don’t just rely on default settings—those are built for beginners, not developers who care about ranking. Here’s what you should watch out for, no matter your builder:
Page speed? That’s huge for ranking. Here’s a quick look at platform performance based on a small test with five sites made by web pros last year:
Platform | Average Mobile Speed Score (Google PageSpeed) |
---|---|
Webflow | 88 |
Squarespace | 73 |
So if speed matters to you (and it should), Webflow comes out a bit ahead, but you’ve still got to watch your images and scripts.
Another easy win: use clean, semantic HTML. Webflow’s Designer lets you add headings, sections, and ARIA labels however you want. In Squarespace, you get decent markup, but customizing structure takes more creative workarounds.
If your client or boss needs analytics, both builders let you drop Google Analytics or other tag scripts into the header. Don’t forget to set up Google Search Console—it’ll help you fix crawl errors and measure what’s actually working for your website builders SEO plan.
One more tip—don’t ignore internal links. Whether you’re making a blog, a shop, or a portfolio, linking your pages together helps Google crawl and helps real people find what they need. It’s basic, but it works every time.